« Arctic Housing and Community Planning »
à la « Arctic Change 2017 Conference », Centre des Congrès de Québec
 
"Arctic Housing and Community Planning"
at the "Arctic Change 2017 Conference ", Quebec City Convention Centre

14 décembre 2017 / December 14th, 2017 

L'édition 2017 de la Arctic Change Conference s'est tenue du 11 au 15 décembre Centre des Congrès de Québec. La conférence a permis de rassembler au-dessus de 1500 participants dont des chercheurs, des étudiants, des élus, des représentants des communautés et des industries de tous les domaines s'intéressant ou étant lié à la condition du Nord. 

* * *

The Arctic Change Conference took place on December 11th to 15th 2017 at Quebec City Convention Center. The conference brought together over 1,500 participants including researchers, students, elected representatives, community representatives and industry representatives from all fields interested or related to the North condition.

PROGRAMME / SCHEDULE

 
 

ARCTIC HOUSING AND COMMUNITY PLANNING

HUM 04

 

Jeudi, 14 octobre 2017 / Thursday, December 14th, 2017

Centre des Congrès de Québec / Quebec City Convention Centre

Le logement durable et la planification communautaire en Arctique sont aggravés par les changements climatiques et l'urbanisation. L'accès aux logements abordables, adéquats, adaptés, accessibles, culturellement appropriés et sécuritaires pour les habitants de l'Arctique est une condition importante du bien-être. Il existe un besoin de logements, d'espaces publics et de commodités, ainsi que de conceptions et de solutions d'infrastructure biotechniques et socioculturelles adaptées aux conditions climatiques et environnementales du Nord, ainsi qu'aux modes de vie et aux préférences culturelles locales. Ceux-ci devront également être flexibles et adaptés aux exigences d'une population en croissance rapide et d'un climat changeant.

 

Cette session visait à offrir un espace de dialogue et de partage des connaissances entre les différents secteurs et disciplines, notamment: construction et design; les impacts sur la santé et le bien-être; énergie et infrastructure; planifier l'urbanisation de l'Arctique; la gouvernance; et plus. Des acteurs de différents secteurs d'intervention du Nunavik, du Nunavut, du Nunatsiavut et de Toronto ont dirigé un groupe de discussion sur des solutions au logement et à la planification communautaire en Arctique pour conclure cette journée d'échanges.

Sustainable housing and community planning in the Arctic is compounded by climate change and urbanization. The provision of affordable, adequate, suitable, accessible, culturally-appropriate, and safe housing for people across the Arctic is an important condition for well-being. There is a need for housing, public space and amenities, as well as biotechnical and sociocultural infrastructure designs and solutions that are suited to northern climate and environmental conditions, and to local lifestyles and cultural preferences. These will also have to be flexible and adapted to the demands of a rapidly growing population and a changing climate.

 

This session aimed to provide a space for dialogue and knowledgesharing between different sectors and disciplines, including: construction and design; impacts on health and well-being; energy and infrastructure; planning for an urbanizing Arctic; governance; and more. Actors from different sectors of intervention from Nunavik, Nunavut, Nunatsiavut and Toronto led a discussion panel on solutions for arctic housing and community planning to close this day of exchanges.

VIDÉOS ET RÉSUMÉS / VIDEOS AND ABSTRACTS

INTRODUCTION

Arctic Housing and Community Planning

Geneviève Vachon

Université Laval, Québec QC, Canada

Please reload

BLOCK 1 - DWELLING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION

Architectural lessons on foundation building in Van Tat Gwich’in territory: Foundation typologies constructed within this continuous permafrost region and their reciprocal relationships with people, buildings, and the land

Katherine Kovalcik

University of Waterloo, Cambridge ON, Canada

La fondation est une composante architecturale qui sert de médiateur dans la relation entre un bâtiment et la terre. C'est un lien particulièrement difficile à trouver dans les sols dynamiques qui reposent sur le pergélisol. Reliant le cercle polaire dans le nord du Yukon, le territoire des Van Tat Gwich'in se situe entre les réalités culturelles et géopolitiques du Nord et du Sud. Les vies et les connaissances des peuples qui ont habité ce lieu pendant des millénaires sont liées à une terre mouvante, qui connaît à la fois des saisons changeantes et des tendances au réchauffement croissantes. Les Van Tat Gwich'in, à l'instar de nombreux peuples autochtones du Nord, se positionnent comme les «faiseurs de terrain» du changement environnemental sur leur territoire. Des «experts» professionnels distanciés abordent également ce problème crucial à travers la recherche et la conception. Ces points de vue se recoupent dans les pratiques de conception, de construction et d'entretien des fondations. Les fondations sont situées dans un réseau de réciprocité qui entrelace plusieurs façons de connaître la terre.

 

Conceptuellement, ce document positionne les fondations comme des connexions à la terre. Il existe deux typologies de fondations principales pour construire sur le pergélisol: des fondations profondes et peu profondes. Les fondations profondes - telles que les pieux qui nécessitent des matériaux, de l'équipement et une main-d'œuvre qualifiée importés - tentent d'isoler un bâtiment au-dessus de la surface supérieure du sol de la couche active en se reliant à un matériau plus solide en dessous. Des fondations peu profondes - telles que le design vernaculaire Gwich'in en bois utilisés dans la vie contemporaine sur le territoire - flottent au-dessus ou à l'intérieur de la surface de la terre. Ces derniers types de systèmes sont souvent utilisés dans la construction résidentielle, où les transformations du sol peuvent se manifester dans les expériences physiques de la vie dans ces bâtiments, et entraînent souvent le besoin de maintenir et de re-niveler constamment ces structures. À mesure que la terre change avec le changement climatique, de nombreuses fondations doivent s'adapter et creuser plus profondément ou tolérer plus de mouvement.

 

Sur le plan méthodologique, cet article est compilé sous la forme d'un aperçu académique des relations multi-scalaires entre les personnes, les bâtiments et les terres sur lesquelles l'architecture pourrait s'appuyer. Ce travail prend la forme d'un index illustré non-technique et ouvert de typologies de fondation existantes pour construire dans cette région continue de pergélisol, et détaille comment ces systèmes fonctionnent. À plus grande échelle, une série supplémentaire de dessins en coupe profonde annote les interrelations entre les bâtiments et le sol, et dépasse le cadre typique de l'architecte.

Cet article présente une compréhension des fondations éclairées par une constellation de travaux comprenant la recherche architecturale, les conversations et le temps passé au cours de deux saisons estivales à Old Crow, au Yukon, et l'expérience de l'auteur sur les terres avec des citoyens locaux à lui. Écrit de la position d'un «non-connaisseur» - un étudiant en visite de l'architecture et de la terre - cet article propose une série de questions, des initiations, et invite à la considération du concepteur invité qui émergent à travers l'examen des fondements et leur réciprocité les relations avec les gens, les bâtiments et la terre.

* * *

The foundation is an architectural component that mediates the relationship between a building and the land. It is a connection that is particularly challenging to ground in dynamic soils underlain by permafrost. Bridging the Arctic Circle in the Northern Yukon, Van Tat Gwich’in territory is situated between overlapping cultural and geopolitical realities of the North and the South. The lives and knowledge of the Peoples who have inhabited this place for millennia are entangled with a shifting land, one that experiences both changing seasons and increasing warming trends. The Van Tat Gwich’in, like many northern Indigenous Peoples, are positioned as the ‘ground truthers’ of environmental change in their territory. Distanced professional ‘experts’ also engage this critical issue through research and design. These perspectives overlap in the practices of foundation design, building, and maintenance. Foundations are located within a web of reciprocity that intertwines multiple ways of knowing the land.

 

Conceptually, this paper positions foundations as connections to the land. Two main foundation typologies exist for building on permafrost: deep and shallow foundations. Deep foundations – such as piles that require imported materials, equipment, and skilled labour – attempt to isolate a building above the upper surface of the ground from the shifting, active layer by connecting to a more solid material below. Shallow foundations – such as vernacular Gwich’in timber designs used in contemporary life out on the land – float on top of or within the earth’s surface. The latter types of systems are often used in residential construction, where the ground’s transformations can manifest themselves in the physical experiences of living in these buildings, and often result in a need to maintain and constantly re-level these structures. As the land shifts with climate change, many foundations must adapt and either dig deeper or tolerate more movement.

 

Methodologically, this paper is compiled as an academic overview of the multi-scalar relationships between people, buildings, and the land that architecture might build on. This work takes the form of an open-ended and non-technical illustrated index of existing foundation typologies for building in this continuous permafrost region, and details how these systems function. At a larger scale, an additional series of deep section drawings annotates the interrelationships between buildings and the ground, and looks beyond the architect’s typical ‘ground-up’ purview.

This paper presents an understanding of foundations informed by a constellation of work that includes architectural research, conversations, and time spent over the course of two summer seasons in Old Crow, Yukon, and the author’s experience out on the land with local citizens who live close to it. Written from the position of a ‘not-knower’ – a visiting student of architecture and the land – this paper offers a series of questions, attunements, and prompts for the consideration of the visiting designer that emerge through the examination of foundations and their reciprocal relationships with people, buildings, and the land.

Vagabond, nomadic house (imagination + construction + experience)

Myriam Blais

Université Laval, Québec QC, Canada

* * *

The recent sedentarization of Nunavik’s Inuit communities is addressed through an understanding of the nomadic ideal that has characterized – and still does – their relationship to their land and dwelling territories. By tackling the housing crisis mainly in a qualitative manner, we aimed at developing a variety of new possibilities. The idea of the nomadic, vagabond house is thus at the heart of the studio work done by architecture Masters students, at various scales and for different occasions. The studio aimed at reinventing challenges that are taken for granted. Two main questions emerged [How to live in an arctic environment? How to build in an arctic environment?], which prompted students to “imagine” the ideal “experience” that culturally appropriate housing projects should offer, and to devise relevant and sustainable design and construction methods to achieve it. Design hypotheses implied that: 1) architecture produces the physical frameworks that allow dwelling; 2) dwelling, as fact and as aspiration, articulates various relationships between architecture and reality; 3) the architect’s task consists in inventing opportunities for dwelling, in building them.

 

In such context, the studio developed along a three-step sequence which offered a kind of itinerary for the students’ inquiries and architectural projects :

- Imagination + Construction. This first step invited students to “reinvent” design challenges for Northern dwellings, culturally and territorially appropriate for Inuit populations (the “vagabond” attitude of the studio), while revisiting their own preconceptions about the North and Inuit communities. They had to imagine the ideal experience that Inuit dwelling should offer, identify the project’s type and characteristics, and specify the most relevant and promising opportunities for construction development (in terms of systems, processes and materials).

- Construction + Experience. This step aimed at materializing design intentions through the study and development of construction systems that are appropriate to the climatic and cultural contexts of Nunavik. The synthesis of the entire design approach has been carried out, considering that the project experience is the result of an eloquent conciliation of imagination and construction.

- Atlas – illustrated travelers’ stories (Imagination + Construction + Experience). As a critical synthesis, this step anticipates on the reality and the realization of the housing projects. Illustrated scenarios of implementation of projects were produced that judiciously (and as much as possible) mobilized local resources (be they human, material, or natural).

This communication present a few of those new itineraries for contemporary Inuit dwellings.

Housing design for the Inuit Nunangat communities, a two tier approach: Fast paced (address the housing shortage crisis) and slow paced (research and develop sustainable housing solutions)

Sami Tannoury

EVOQ architecture, Montréal QC, Canada

* * *

Numerous studies and reports have documented the housing shortage crisis in Inuit communities. With population growth well over the national average, and inadequate federal and provincial funding, Inuit communities are unable to keep up with their advancing needs. The effects of this crisis are wide-spread and promote overcrowded houses, deterioration of housing stock, family tensions, social tensions, education problems, as well as health and security issues. Without effective solutions and added funding the only foreseeable future is further decline.

EVOQ architecture has been designing housing projects for the Inuit Nunangat communities for the past 20 years. Our team has developed over 15 different housing models and has overseen the construction of over 500 housing units in Nunavik, Nunavut and Nunatsiavut. We have helped our clients develop housing amid the ongoing housing crisis with the objective of building as much housing as possible. This faced pace approach is essential to counteract the housing shortage crisis. Through our sustained relationship, and thanks to the communities’ sharing and mentoring, over the years, we have developed a unique understanding of the constraints of building in these remote communities and we were also able to develop insight into the specific housing needs of these communities.

The knowledge acquired through these ‘’in the trenches’’ experiences led, in time and as trust grew, to discussions about long term goals and possible improvements to ongoing projects. This slow paced approach is a true and sincere dialogue that has evolved through meetings, design charettes and public consultations. This dialogue process has led to the design and construction of two pilot projects in Nunavik and Nunatsaivut that are meant to serve as a benchmarks to future housing development.

The lessons learned over the years have confirmed our belief that sustainable building design must strive to achieve more than efficient housing construction systems and energy efficiency targets. Protection of cultural diversity is as important, if not more so. This means that the ideal house for the Inuit Nunangat does not exists. A one shoe fits all approach is not sustainable even if it simplifies, in appearance, management of housing development. The multiple housing models developed attest to the variety of housing needs.

These shared experiences, where local communities are heavily involved, speak loudly to the responsibility of Sustainable Building Design in Inuit communities to go one step further and to support cultural reappropriation and empowerment.

Discussion

moderated by André Casault

Please reload

BLOCK 2 - COMMUNITY PLANNING PROCESSES

Inuit Quajimajatuqangit : How involvement of the community of Ikaluktitiak (Cambridge Bay), Nunavut, was key in helping generate the architectural design of the Canadian High Arctic Research Station (CHARS)

Alain Fournier

EVOQ architecture (McGill U 1975), Montréal QC, Canada

 

 

* * *

 

The Canadian High Arctic Research Station (CHARS) built in Ikaluktutiak (Cambridge Bay), Nunavut, as part of Canada’s Northern Strategy, is nearing completion. The architects (FGMDA/NFOE) were commissioned to design a world-class Arctic research station, demonstrating state of the art design excellence that serves as a model for similar polar facilities around the world. Now Polar Knowledge Canada’s headquarters, covering 83,000m2, it is the largest facility in the Inuit Nunangat territory.

 

The commission also stated that the CHARS would have to be integrated, in every way possible, to the host Inuit community of Ikaluktutiak . While CHARS will make an international statement on Canadian research in the Arctic, it must also be an architectural representation of Inuit culture to ensure full integration into the community of Ikaluktutiak. The design and fundamental personality of the CHARS tangibly and visibly constitute a major break away from the old scientific research station model in Arctic communities. The CHARS brings Traditional Science and Technology and Traditional Inuit knowledge to work together under one roof. The architecture (planning and design) of the Station reflects and makes possible this new paradigm.

The community’s participation to the design process set a leading-edge precedent of collaborative community design. The community was involved from the very outset of the actual project definition. Numerous consultations, meetings and discussions were held at many important junctures in the design process. These were held with various community groups (elders, youths, community leaders, etc.) This small group approach proved to be

very effective, letting all voices to be heard, unencumbered by deference to age, status or public speaking abilities. The resulting building design can be said to have been the result of real co-design. The community asked the architects to integrate Inuit Quaujimajatuqangit (IQ) principles in the design of the station. Inuit Quaujimajatuqangit literally translates as ‘What should be known by Inuit. This holistic set of concepts was articulated by the Nunavummiut to assist them in creating their territory Nunavut and shaping all aspects of

its development.

Imagining Inukjuak’s future development, a review of Northern planning issues and strategies

Julien Landry

Université Laval, Québec QC, Canada

Laurence St-Jean

Université Laval, Québec QC, Canada

 

* * *

 

This communication presents the results of an urban design project that focus on representing sustainable and culturally appropriate scenarios and strategies for development and consolidation of the Inuit villages in Nunavik. Illustrated with urban design proposals, these «opportunities» take place on familiar sites in the community of Inukjuak, considering qualities desired by the Inuit. These representations highlight the impacts of certain actions on the environments such as access to community services, the variety of uses and dwellings, the location of houses, etc. After validation with community members, this collection of ideas could help inform decision-making by local Nunavik stakeholders who are implementing their new masterplan and to include citizens in the development of shared visions for the future of Nunavik.

For several years, the lack of housing has led to the emergency construction of clusters of identical houses resulting from standardized programs. Uniform supply of housing, both in terms of program and tenure, does not seem to meet Inuit needs and aspirations nor the diverse demands of different types of households (nuclear families, extended or single-parent families, young couples, singles, etc.). The lack of complementary solutions to social housing hinders Inuit initiatives and participation in housing construction. Some interviewed Inuit expressed that the current construction methods are insensitive to the richness of natural landscapes, from an ecological and a symbolic point of view. Village facilities are often gray, repetitive, standardized, and monotonous.

 

A one-week stay in Nunavik last March provided an opportunity to visit potential sites, submit draft sketches, and collect new data from the land and local populations. Different technical, cultural and policy issues were discussed with local managers. These consultations were intended to enrich the proposals for a variety of «knowledge» in order to reflect the aspirations, values and visions of local people for living environment.

 

Based on consultations and meetings with managers, four development themes had been identified : Preservation, Consolidation, Diversity and Meeting Places. These themes help to frame the various issues and potential concerning the urban planning of northern villages, but intend to be flexible, since the issues are not mutually exclusive to each of the themes. The propositions are rather complementary and transcend the different scales of intervention.

The proposals are based on current planning practices in Nunavik while drawing inspirations from innovative examples of northern development observed elsewhere in the world. The approach is also enriched by local aspirations and values. The results of this work are published on a friendly-user web site. A series of printable posters, intended for discussion meetings through Northern Villages, also summarizes the results and the process of this research.

Discussion

moderated by Marika Vachon

Please reload

BLOCK 3 - ENERGY AND INFRASTRUCTURE